796EFC-1-1-27_0102c.tif
		if it was necessary to change the ball during the progress of the game, then a ball similar in all 
		respects to the original one should be used. He suggested that perhaps an instruction or Regulation 
		that the coloured ball, not necessarily a White Ball, should be available if required during the 
		months of November, December, January and February would meet with the approval of the Clubs.

Alteration to	  Sunderland F. C. referred once again to this Rule and the disadvantages accruing from it.
Off-side Law as	They intended to bring forward a proposition at the Annual General Meeting that strong 
it concerns a	representation be made to The Football Association that this Rule should be abolished.
Player played
"On side."	  Portsmouth F. C. stated that they whole heartedly supported the proposition.
		  Wolverhampton Wanderers F. C. stated that they had brought this matter forward two or 
		three years ago, when they were informed that it had been forwarded for the consideration of 
		The Football Association.

		  The President informed the Clubs that, as a result of the Wolverhampton Wanderers F. C. 
		suggestion, representation had been made to The Football Association, who had been themselves 
		concerned about this weakness in the Rule for years. The difficulty had been to find a suitable 
		formula which would have the desired effect and also meet with the approval of the International 
		Board. On the last occasion the matter fell down somewhere between The Football Association 
		and the International Board.

Promotion and	  The Third Division South Representative said that, in putting forward this suggestion once 
Relegation	again, his Section were of the opinion that there was an obvious crack appearing in the facade of 
Four Up and	The League. In the light of this Season's programme it was necessary to do something urgently. 
Four Down.	They were quite satisfied that the fall in attendance after Christmas was due in a large proportion
		to the fact that in the Third Division, the promotion race only concerned one or two Clubs, and
		the spectators generally lost interest.

		  They thought that the greater movement of Clubs from one division to another would go a long 
		way towards reviving this interest and relieving the financial burden of Clubs. They hoped that 
		the First and Second Division Clubs would support their suggestion, because it was imperative 
		that ways and means must be found to make the Third Division more self supporting.

		  Plymouth Argyle F. C. stated that they supported the proposition which they considered to 
		be for the benefit of all Clubs in The League. They would like to hear the views of those Clubs who 
		voted against it at the last Annual General Meeting and also those of the Management Committee, 
		together with the reasons for such views.

		  Portsmouth F. C. said that they were against it, because in their opinion it would mean far 
		too many changes in the construction of The League with a consequent lowering of the standard 
		of football nationally.

		  Queen's Park Rangers F. C. thought it was a good thing, and that if it was given a sporting 
		chance the Clubs would never have any cause to regret it.

		  Wolverhampton Wanderers F. C. wondered whether the Third Division would be prepared 
		for the two Clubs at the bottom to drop out of these divisions each year if this proposal were carried.

		  Torquay United F. C. also spoke in support and expressed the opinion that it would be for 
		the benefit of the Clubs and the game in general.

		  The President said that it was quite easy to say something on this subject and be drawn into 
		an argument. He did not wish to hurt anybody's feelings and he felt that this was a matter entirely 
		for the Clubs to decide at the Annual General Meeting.

Increased	  The Third Division North Representative said they were a little at a loss to understand the 
Representation	objection to this request. The Third Division had been formed 33 years ago, and to-day they had 
for Associate	only 4 votes for 48 Clubs. They were reasonable people and could not see any objection to the 
Members.	small request they were making. They realised that they were junior members of the family, but 
		thought that their request to increase their number of votes from 4 to 8 against the 44 votes held 
		by the First and Second Division Clubs was a very small one.

		  West Bromwich Albion F. C. spoke against the proposition and reminded the Third Division 
		that when the Divisions were formed the Clubs had stated that their only desire was to come in 
		under The League's umbrella and they only wanted one vote each to represent them.

		  Luton Town F. C. spoke in favour and suggested that changing times needed changing methods. 
		In their opinion it was unfair for the Third Divisions to come to meetings of the League with only 
		4 votes against 44.

		  Accrington Stanley F. C. stated that Third Division Clubs were taking a greater share in the 
		game to-day and all they asked for was fair play.

		  Tottenham Hotspur F. C. thought that the Third Division could strengthen their case by 
		dealing with the Football Association whose rule made it necessary to have Associate members, 
		because a League could not consist of more than 44 members.

		  Plymouth Argyle F. C. wished to make progress and supported the proposition.

		  Doncaster Rovers F. C. thought the time had come for higher representation on behalf of the 
		Third Division Clubs.

		  The President stated that this matter was entirely one for the Clubs to decide at the Annual 
		General Meeting. He was sure that the Management Committee would wish him to say on their 
		behalf that they were just as conscious of and sympathetic to the problems of the Third Division 
		Clubs as they were in the case of the other Clubs in The League.

Alteration of	  The Third Division Representative said that this matter had been before the Annual General 
Rule 69 re	Meeting last year. He was rather of the opinion that he had been misunderstood and could not 
Transfer Fees	understand how anyone could be against it. The necessity for the transfer rights of the players 
where a Club is	of any Club leaving The League passing to the Management Committee was accepted, but they 
not re-elected.	could not understand why only two thirds of the proceeds should be given to the Club, if it had met

								3